![]() ![]() That is our privacy policy in a nutshell." It maintains logs of all search terms used "though not in a personally identifiable way". Gabriel Weinberg, creator of DuckDuckGo, states: "By default, DuckDuckGo does not collect or share personal information. DuckDuckGo positions itself as a search engine that puts privacy first and as such it does not store IP addresses, does not log user information, and uses cookies only when required. As of February 2021, it had 98,788,333 daily searches on average. It also uses data from crowdsourced sites, including Wikipedia, to populate knowledge panel boxes to the right of the results. Other companies like Yahoo, DuckDuckGo and StartPage repackage Bing and Google search results.ĭuckDuckGo's results are a compilation of "over 400" sources, including Yahoo! Search BOSS, Wolfram Alpha, Bing), Yandex, its own web crawler (the DuckDuckBot) and others. UPDATE: I saw several similar articles never mentioning DuckDuckGo until this one. Orgīuilding the global movement for the protection of privacy. Related Subreddits:Ĭonsider donating to one of the organizations that fight for your rights. u/blackhawk_12 Subreddit Rules and Wikiīefore posting in /r/privacy, read the Sidebar Rules.Įnjoy our Wiki! It has all sorts of nifty advice and explains most topics you’re interested in if you’re reading this. "I don't have anything to hide but I don't have anything I want to show you either" I'll be keeping an eye on Brave Search but I'm not too optimistic given Brave's focus and the current state of the public web.Dedicated to the intersection of technology, privacy, and freedom in the digital world. I'm back to using DuckDuckGo as my default now. However, it takes a lot of resources, and with Google being the default, it's difficult to see how they can be sustainable in the long run. It's always great to see new search indexes being brought in to challenge the current state of web search. Brave embeds those sections in between results, which is still annoying but not at bad as having them right at the top. This isn't much different from how DuckDuckGo annoyingly inserts shopping, news and map embeds at the top, causing layout shifts and missed clicks I had to use ad block for those too. There's no way to disable it other than by using an ad blocker to pick out and remove the DOM element. Since it doesn't always appear, it makes search unpredictable. They have an annoying "AI summarizer" which takes up a good chunk of the results page. With Brave being all in on cryptocurrency, it's not a surprise that they're into AI too. Sometimes it resolves, sometimes it doesn't. There are times when Brave seems to get stuck loading. This has never happened to me on other search engines. Making queries too fast triggers a captcha page sometimes. I'm not sure if Brave is planning to provide its own image search, but it's a massive hole for a default provider, even if 50% of the time I end up having to use Google anyway. This choice needs to be made every time on new sessions, which gets a bit annoying when using multi-account containers and private windows. Oddly enough, image search is one of the best ways to find more niche websites as spam tends to avoid using relevant images.īrave requires you to pick Google or Bing for image search. There's just too many issues and limitations which make it unreliable as a default choice. It's been a few months since then and overall, I'd say it's been okay, but not acceptable. Given all of these positivies, I made it my default. It even supports ! operators like DuckDuckGo. It provides Reddit results in a dedicated "Discussions" section, without needing to add a site: filter. Better than Bingīrave Search has its own index and the results are pretty good given it's only been around for a year or so. The only notable alternatives to Google and Bing are some paid options (like Kagi) which need accounts and Brave Search. It doesn't need to create a good product when it can just force its billions of Windows users to use it. ![]() Microsoft was never all in on being a good search engine, it just wants to be a part of every possible market. I think it's down to it being reliant on Bing's index. Wikipedia should easily be prioritised and break through all the spam. It's gotten to a point where it doesn't even show relevant Wikipedia articles. However, over the last year or so, DuckDuckGo's search quality has tanked. If I needed Google's take on a search, it was a !g away. It did what I needed and its interface was clean and simple. At first it seemed great, a privacy-focused search engine which provides pretty good results. I've been using DuckDuckGo for a good few years now.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |